BREEDING CONDITIONS REPORT, 2003


RESPONDENT

Vasily Sokolov

SITE NAME

Erkatayakha and Payutayakha rivers, Yamal, Russia

Contact details (phone/fax//e-mail//address):
(343) 210-3858, add. 104/89028432787 // vsokolov@inbox.ru // Lab. of biocenological processes, Inst. of plant and animal ecology, 8 Marta Str, 202, Ekaterinburg, 620144 Russia

PROJECT DETAILS

Project name:

Dynamics of bird numbers on south-western Yamal

Start of survey:

End of survey: Team size:

8.06

27.07

6


WEATHER CONDITIONS

Season phenology: average

Weather conditions:

According to reports of local people spring development was very rapid which resulted in early nesting of some bird species belonging to early migrants (geese, swans, some passerines). However, adverse weather conditions (frequent snowfalls, rains, northern wind and relative low temperature) prevailed during arrival of most species, thus arrival and start of nesting of most passerines and waders were prolonged. Pelting rain was replaced by abundant snow in the period from 16 to 18 June, and water table in rivers and connecting lakes reached flood-time level. Presumably, high water was responsible for flooding of duck and wader nests, as hatching in all found nests of ducks started only after 25 July. Weather was favourable for bird breeding in the second half of June to mid July. Air temperature was especially high from mid June to mid July and reached +36øC on some days. Second broods were found in some species of passerines.

 

Season temperature: warm
Season humidity: dry
Date of 50% snow-cover: 25-30.05
Date of ice-break on rivers: 27.05-10.06
Date of final loss of snow: 15-18.06

BIOTIC CONDITIONS

Rodents abundance evaluation:

average

Breeding conditions:

According to reports of local people Willow Grouse were more abundant in winter compared with previous years, and hares also occurred in high numbers. Arctic Foxes were numerous until November, but then they migrated elsewhere. Numbers of Snowy Owls in winter were not high and reached previously observed levels only in October.
Predation was low in summer as solitary Arctic Foxes were recorded, numbers of skuas were low, Rough-legged Buzzards were seen only in June and their nests failed due to low numbers of rodents. We observed falling of nests of birds of prey on bluffs after the period of inclement weather from 16-18 June.
Reproductive success was very high in passerines and ptarmigans due to favourable conditions during egg-laying, incubation and brood-raring. Nests of waterfowl and divers near shoreline of rivers and lakes presumably were flooded in mid June judging by high numbers of non-breeding geese in late June and late hatching in ducks.
 

Rodent dynamics:

Local people explain low numbers of predators in winter by frequent rains in October-November 2002 which caused freezing of thin snow into ice layer. Then snow was removed from this layer surface by winds, and bushes were not covered by snow during the whole winter. Presumably, winter weather conditions adversely affected lemmings and Microtus voles and did not allow them to reach peak numbers which should have occurred according to our prognosis. Local herdsmen reported findings of dead rodents during winter, and also characterized winter as very unfavourable for reindeer.
We captured 5, 25 and 3 Collared Lemmings, Middendorff's Voles and Narrow-skulled Voles, respectively, using snap-traps. Numbers of Middendorff's Voles and, probably, Collared Lemmings have increased by the end of July, and pregnant females were found in the latter species.

Rodent species recorded:

LatinAbundance
Dicrostonyx torquatusrare
Microtus middendorfficommon
Microtus gregalisrare

Summary of fauna studies:

Absolute bird counts were conducted on plots of different size depending on species: 3.5 sq.km for waders and some passerines, 10 sq.km for ducks, ptarmigans and some waders and 100 sq.km for geese, swans and birds of prey.

 

FAUNA IN STUDY AREA

Group of speciesPresenceAbundanceBreedingDetailed studiesComment
arctic foxesYesrare   
lemmingsYesrarebreedingYes 
volesYescommonbreedingYes 
wadersYescommonfledgingYes 
swansYesrare   
geeseYescommonhatchingYes 
ducksYescommonbreedingYes 
buzzardsYesrarebreeding  
ptarmigansYesabundantfledgingYes 
skuasYesrarebreeding  
gulls/ternsYescommonhatching  
owlsYesrare   
passerinesYesabundantfledgingYes 

 

SEABIRD COLONIES

speciesComment

 

WATERBIRD NON-BREEDING AGGREGATIONS

speciesAggregation typeNumberComment
Anas acutapre-moult  
Anas penelopepre-moult 150-200, 25, 30
Aythya marilapre-moult 70, 55

 

HUMAN ACTIVITY IN THE STUDY AREA

Human activityComment
reindeer herding 
seasonal fishing/hunting 
summer field camp 
vicinities of a permanent human settlement 

 


Recommended citation

Sokolov, V.A., Sokolov, A.A. (2003). Breeding conditions report for Erkatayakha and Payutayakha rivers, Yamal, Russia, 2003. ARCTIC BIRDS: an international breeding conditions survey. (Online database). Eds. M.Soloviev, P.Tomkovich. . Updated 11 Dec. 2008. Accessed .

 See also

Sokolov V.A. 2003. Autumn aspect of bird population on southwestern Yamal. Materials on bird distribution on Urals, in Ural foothills and Western Siberia. Ekaterinburg. in press.
Sokolov V.A. 2003. Data on bird fauna of the Erkuta and Payuta river basin (southwestern Yamal) in 2003. Materials on bird distribution on Urals, in Ural foothills and Western Siberia. Ekaterinburg. in press.
Sokolov V.A. 2003. Dynamics of spatial structure of bird populations on southwestern Yamal in the nesting period. Materials of the conference of young scientists. Ekaterinburg, in press.

 more on citation guidelines

 

HOME PAGE